FEA Correlation & Material Modeling
I develop simulation workflows that are anchored to test boundary conditions, and I use correlation to make models predictive—not just visually similar. My experience spans implicit and explicit approaches and includes material modeling for composites, hybrid assemblies, and bonded interfaces.
Modeling scope
Model setup that mirrors the test
Geometry fidelity where it matters (grips, tabs, fillets, bondlines, constraints)
Correct boundary conditions (load introduction, contact, sliding, friction, clamping)
Material modeling & calibration
Orthotropic composite behavior (lamina/laminate level)
Progressive damage / failure onset calibration using test evidence
Hybrid stacks (metal + composite) with attention to stiffness mismatch and interface effects
Interfaces & bonding
Tied / cohesive / traction–separation concepts as needed
Failure mode matching: adhesive vs cohesive vs interlaminar
Correlation workflow
Stress–strain response, stiffness, failure onset, and localization patterns
Sensitivity studies to quantify uncertainty and margins
Tools & approach
Experienced with implicit and explicit FE solvers and the practical tradeoffs between them (stability, runtime, contact, failure, and convergence).
Comfortable building material cards and calibration loops from coupon data to component-level models.
Typical deliverables
Correlated FE model package
Calibrated material parameters + bounds
Sensitivity/uncertainty summary
Design-focused interpretation








Contact
Reach out for custom composite solutions
Mehdi.Ghazimoradi@gmail.com
© 2025. All rights reserved.