FEA Correlation & Material Modeling

I develop simulation workflows that are anchored to test boundary conditions, and I use correlation to make models predictive—not just visually similar. My experience spans implicit and explicit approaches and includes material modeling for composites, hybrid assemblies, and bonded interfaces.

Modeling scope

  • Model setup that mirrors the test

    • Geometry fidelity where it matters (grips, tabs, fillets, bondlines, constraints)

    • Correct boundary conditions (load introduction, contact, sliding, friction, clamping)

  • Material modeling & calibration

    • Orthotropic composite behavior (lamina/laminate level)

    • Progressive damage / failure onset calibration using test evidence

    • Hybrid stacks (metal + composite) with attention to stiffness mismatch and interface effects

  • Interfaces & bonding

    • Tied / cohesive / traction–separation concepts as needed

    • Failure mode matching: adhesive vs cohesive vs interlaminar

  • Correlation workflow

    • Stress–strain response, stiffness, failure onset, and localization patterns

    • Sensitivity studies to quantify uncertainty and margins

Tools & approach

  • Experienced with implicit and explicit FE solvers and the practical tradeoffs between them (stability, runtime, contact, failure, and convergence).

  • Comfortable building material cards and calibration loops from coupon data to component-level models.


Typical deliverables

  • Correlated FE model package

  • Calibrated material parameters + bounds

  • Sensitivity/uncertainty summary

  • Design-focused interpretation